Did Ladies Swim during the Regency Era?
In Jane Austen’s day, during the prim and proper Regency era, did young ladies ever indulge in a swim?
Fiona, my heroine in LADY FIASCO, a Traditional Regency Romance, liked to swim. (Not in the nude, mind you. She wore the customary conservative dark blue bathing dress that covered her quite thoroughly.)
But is it plausible that a young lady in the Regency era would even know how to swim?
Some say yes, others say no. Let’s have some fun and investigate this controversy.
(I apologize for the nudity in this engraving. This is a caricature done in 1790 by the popular caricaturist of the era, Thomas Rowlandson, depicting the reason why the British government needed to designate separate beaches for men and women.)
What evidence exists?
Hearsay
Naysayers reluctantly admit that a few gentlemen might have known how to swim, but they insist that women did not indulge in the sport beyond taking a dip at Brighton. Others will say that there are always exceptions to a rule. Conjecture on either side must be ruled out as unreliable.
Trolling for Proof
For reliable proof we can turn to: diaries, journals, books written during the time period, etchings, paintings, and drawings.
Let’s start with sea bathing. We have irrefutable proof, scores of writings and paintings documenting that “sea bathing” came into vogue during the Georgian era. Even baby King George the III was brought to the sea where the famous “dipper”Martha Gunn took him for his first dip in the sea.
As seen in the first illustration, sea-bathing was so prevalent that Georgian law required men and women to have separate beaches. This is because people often stripped to their birthday suits to take the plunge.
For more about this, check out this scholarly and informative article: Sea Bathing in Georgian Brighton
But can we really say sea bathing is the same as swimming?
Yes and no.
For waders, dippers, and those just wanting a good salty wash, the answer is no. For those daring souls, who ventured out deeper into the ocean, those who plunged under the waves, the exercise would require a certain amount of prowess in the water. Anyone who has been in more than four or five feet of surf knows that. Yes, they would need to know how to swim or learn real quick.
In this 1790 hand-colored etching of a woman swimming by Thomas Rowlandson [below] we can see that the artist understood at least the rudimentary skills of swimming. She is prone rather than dog paddling, She is using an extended scooping stroke that looks suspiciously like an over hand crawl.
(Again I apologize for the graphic nature of these engravings, but there are precious few works of art pertaining to our subject.)
Swimming from a country perspective.
[below] is a lovely little watercolour done by young Diana Sperling, Bathing at Dynes Hall (c. 1812 or 1813). Diana recorded country life from the gentry’s point of view. Her guileless paintings captured the rustic carefree essence of country life. Here we see her young cousins frolicking in the lake in their dark blue water-dresses. Clearly the pond is not deep, but one cousin appears comfortable laying back and floating which, at the very least, indicates a familiarity with water.
Written Accounts
The Rise and Fall of a Regency Dandy is a collection of letters, bills, and journal entries, unearthed from a bank vault in London, detailing the life and times of Scrope Berdmore Davies, a Cambridge school chum of Lord Byron. Scrope’s correspondence refers to a number of swimming outings.
According to letters and bills, the young men at Cambridge often hired ‘watermen’ or what we would now call lifeguards. Watermen were accounted to be excellent swimmers, paid to watch over the men swimming in the rivers or canals.
Sadly, one of Byron’s close friends, Charles Skinner Matthews, drowned while swimming. He got tangled in weeds. Scrope laments in a letter to Byron that had either one of them been present Matthews would not have drowned.
If gentlemen knew how to one would think at least a few of them would educate their sisters and daughters, for safety sake. Ah, but here I go a conjecturing.
The next engraving, dated a little later, 1829, is Mermaids at Brighton by William Heath. It depicts women sea-bathing with bathing machines at Brighton. Note the various abilities in the water depicted by the artist. The rude tags are mine, of course.
What can we conclude from all this?
It is abundantly clear the people enjoyed the water. From Byron and Scrope’s letter we must conclude that many gentlemen knew how to swim. It is also obvious from engravings and paintings that at least some females knew how to swim, too. They were unusual, of course. But then, I always write about unusual women.
Kathleen Baldwin
February 7, 2014 @ 12:54 pm
To comment click on the little comment button at the top or scroll down to the comment box below.
Carole Fowkes
February 7, 2014 @ 4:45 pm
I believe some women didswim, maybe not using the perfect form, but there’ve always been women who enjoy physical activities and challenges. If water were nearby and they had the privacy, I fail to see why these women wouldn’t risk possible censor for a chance to pit themselves against nature and brave the waves.
Kathleen
February 7, 2014 @ 5:20 pm
Hi Carole!
Always a pleasure to hear from you. I like having a mystery/horror writer weighing in. Privacy probably was a key factor. Although according to the records, on the women’s side of the beach at Brighton there were some nude bathers. Nat as many as on the male side – of course. 🙂
Thank you for stopping in.
Sabine Starr
February 7, 2014 @ 5:07 pm
Kathleen, you’ve done it again. You always get us to think outside the box and nothing could be better for a writer. Actually, I can think of several things, but let’s leave that for another time. I particularly like the artistic representations of plus-size women. And imagine how well they floated in water. That alone would have given them confidence, and an edge, in lakes, streams and oceans. Of course women of all eras heeded the siren call of water, but as with so much else that encouraged women’s freedom, independence and strength, those in power would have thought the less said the better. Bravo to you for bringing this to our attention and with such lovely and inspiring graphics. Now bring on the chocolate. I need to pack on a few pounds and head for the beach.
Kathleen
February 7, 2014 @ 5:15 pm
Sabine, you always make me laugh. I hadn’t thought about their lovely figures. Just my size girls. I’m glad you stopped by.
Elizabeth Essex
February 7, 2014 @ 5:39 pm
Kathleen, what a marvelous, well-researched post. I am enthralled by the wonderful illustrations you’ve found. I don’t think I’ve every written a sea-bathing or swimming scene in my books, but I have always maintained that my heroines are very much the type of intrepid young lady who would want to know how to swim and would definitely follow her brothers or country friends into local streams and lakes. I adore that there are both a pictorial written histories to back this up.
Marvelous, fun post! Thanks so much for sharing!
Cheers, EE
Kathleen
February 7, 2014 @ 10:56 pm
Your books are a marvel Ms. Essex. I’m honored you stopped in. I have wondered why, amidst so many of your seafaring heroines, there was not yet a swimming scene. Perhaps now… isn’t there a sinking ship in your latest? Inquiring minds are eager to know.
Tracy Brogan
February 7, 2014 @ 6:01 pm
There is a fabulous book written by Jennifer McQuiston called SUMMER IS FOR LOVERS where Regency era swimming is key to the plot. And it’s set in Brighton. I highly recommend it! Great book.
Kathleen
February 7, 2014 @ 10:54 pm
I appreciate your comment, Tracy! I can’t wait to get a hold of it. Have a lovely evening.
Sandy Blair
February 7, 2014 @ 6:41 pm
Great piece! Loved it and the art work. 🙂 Thanks
Kathleen
February 7, 2014 @ 10:52 pm
Hi Sandy! Waving excitedly. I hope you’re keeping warm up your way. It would be interesting to know if any of your Scottish characters could swim? It’s so cold in the highlands. But there is always summer. Love your books. Thank you for stopping in.
Donna Hatch, Regency romance author
February 10, 2014 @ 1:29 pm
I always assumed there would be some ladies who could swim. I don’t think it was common because the water was probably really cold in England during the mini Ice Age. Also their wet clothing would either have been super heavy and bulky, or would have become transparent, so swimming was probably frowned upon for safety and modesty reasons. But I’m sure kids weren’t all that different then than now and I have always loved to swim, cold water or modesty or not so I can’t help but assume there were plenty of girls who grew up swimming either because they were non-conformists, or tomboys, or just plain water lovers.
Kathleen
February 10, 2014 @ 5:45 pm
Hi Donna! I’m so glad you dropped by.
Yes, you’ve got a compelling point – the temperature. This is one of the more persuasive arguments. And I expect it was a strong deterrent. I mean, it isn’t much fun to shiver and shake in the water. But then, there are always those few sweltering days in summer when it feels divine.
As far as proper swimwear, they generally wore a dark blue cotton dresses. You can see the children wearing them in Diana Sperling’s watercolor [above], and there is a picture of Martha Gunn wearing her traditional blue bathing dress here: http://austenonly.com/2010/03/20/austenprose-sanditon-group-read-a-match-for-every-disorder-sea-bathing-in-the-early-19th-century/
As you say, the dress would be heavy in the water but it kept them fairly modest. Especially in comparison to the flimsy muslin they wore and sometimes dampened to show off their finer parts. 🙂 Ah, what a strange and unusual culture they were. No wonder we love to write about the Regency, yes?
Thanks again for weighing in.